Saturday, 31 December 2011

The Decline Of Print Media Articles

iPads and Kindles force newspapers further away from print

Economics of the digital world are only too evident to the press as handheld devices strike a death knell for old business models
Kindle on tube
The push for digital readers have seen newspapers like the Daily Mail win 5m unique visitors a day – compared with its printed sale of 2m – but struggle to generate revenues to match. Photograph: Sarah Lee for the Guardian
A million iPads and Kindles may have been unwrapped on Sunday – according to tentative analyst estimates – an influx of portable technology that is expected to hasten a decline in the already faltering sales of printed newspapers, adding pressure on traditional business models that have traditionally supported so many titles around the country.
Publishers, preparing for the handheld arrivals, took the chance to break with a tradition that dates back to 1912, when publishers agreed not to produce Christmas Day papers to give paperboys, among others, a day off. For the first time in its 190-year history the Sunday Times published a digital-only edition on 25 December – with the normally paid for product given away in the hope of luring sought after digital subscribers.
Boxing Day publication, for dailies like the Guardian, has also become a necessity – to ensure digital editions for new Kindle and iPad owners to read. The result is that what was a traditionally quiet period for news has become a critical moment to showcase new work, at a time when an industry already riven by the phone-hacking scandal and under judicial examination, is facing what can be described as an existential crisis.
Fifty years ago two national dailies – the Daily Mirror and the Daily Express – sold more than 4m copies each; today the bestselling Sun sells 2.6m. In the last year alone, printed sales declined by 10% for daily broadsheets and by 5% for daily tabloids – and when the News of the World stopped printing last July 600,000 copy sales simply disappeared.
The knock-on impact of the decline has been a push for digital readers that have seen newspapers like the Daily Mail win 5m unique visitors a day – compared with its printed sale of 2m – but struggle to generate revenues to match. The Mail generated £16m from its website last year, out of £608m overall.
Some specialist titles, such as the Financial Times, are managing the transition well – it has 260,000 digital subscribers – up 40% this year – compared with 337,000 buyers of the printed product, where sales are down by 12%. Digital subscribers generate £180 a year and the paper, priced at £2.50 on the newsstand on a weekday, is profitable.
John Ridding, the managing director, says that 30% of the FT's revenues come from digital sales and that "within two or three years" digital readers and revenues will account for more than those from the printed business. During a typical week the number of people signing on digitally is "five to 10 times" what it was a year earlier, as the newspaper looks to a future beyond print.
Others, though, are under pressure. Local newspapers have been hit particularly hard, with 31 titles closing in the last year. Most of those shutting are freesheets – with titles distibuted in Yeovil, Scarborough and Harlow lost. Historic paid for titles have seen their frequency cut: the Liverpool Daily Post is to go weekly in print in the new year, after sales dropped as low as 6,500. Its website, however, will update in real time. Daily titles in Birmingham and Bath have also gone the same way in recent years – while pre-tax profits at Johnston Press, the owner of the Scotsman and the Yorkshire Post, fell from £131.5m five years ago to £16m last year.
Roger Parry, chair of Johnston Press since 2009, believes the party has been over for several years, since Craigslist and Google began to take classified advertising away from local press.
"I think the future is for local multimedia companies which focus on signing up 50% plus of the households in their area on some form of subscription – that's what happens in Scandinavia," he says. For journalists there will have to be a shift from acting as "print writers to multimedia curators. There will be more content created by local people. The National Union of Journalists will hate this but it is fact of life."
With the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, wanting to license local television stations in 20 cities, that gives local media a new way to reach audiences, although some – such as Witney TV in Oxfordshire – have already made a start with a daily offering of local video news. David Cameron, the local MP, regularly appears, but the site is staffed by volunteers, and its content limited – underlining how tough the digital economics are.
There are commercial pressures in national media too. Although the tabloid media have faced criticism at the Leveson inquiry, not least from the likes of Hugh Grant or Steve Coogan, popular titles remain in fair commercial health. Trinity Mirror's stable of nationals – the Daily and Sunday Mirror, the People, and the Record titles in Scotland – will earn about £70m this year, although they made £86m the year before. The profit margin at the Daily Mail hovers at around 10%.
The challenge for the popular press is retaining printed sales – but the financial pressure is acute elsewhere. Three of the traditional broadsheets – the Independent, the Times and the Guardianall lose money in a market where five titles compete for 1.3 million print buyers. Their readers are more likely to make the digital transition too, leaving newspapers no option but to embrace new forms of reporting – such as the live blog – and seed content at digital hubs, such as Facebook.
The Guardian may generate £40m in digital revenues from its largely free offerings, but some of that comes from its dating sites. The Times titles have gone for a low price subscription model, which has attracted 111,000 takers, but which generates £11m a year against an editorial budget estimated at £100m.
Some, like Paul Zwillenberg, from Boston Consulting Group, says serious newspapers "will have to cut their cloth because there will be a smaller pool of revenue and profit". But he acknowledges that by pursuing different business models, they may increase their chances of success. The result, though, is that was once an industry of one business model: a printed product sold on the newstand is fracturing into very different types of mainly digital content companies.

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

Charlie Brooker Article

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/dec/05/charlie-brooker-black-mirror?INTCMP=SRCH

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/dec/01/charlie-brooker-dark-side-gadget-addiction-black-mirror

summary


Charlie Brooker's new satire Black Mirror was Channel 4's biggest drama launch of the year with a total audience of almost 1.9 million viewers.


The first episode of the three-part technology-themed comedy drama had 1.6 million viewers, a 6.1% share between 9pm and 10pm on Sunday, rising to 1.86 million when Channel 4+1 is taken into account.


Black Mirror was up against BBC2's Mark Zuckerberg: Inside Facebook, featuring Emily Maitlis's rare interview with the Facebook founder, which was watched by 1.8 million viewers, a 7.2% share, also between 9pm and 10pm, including 127,000 viewers on the BBC HD channel.

Sunday, 13 November 2011

3 accounts of the James Murdoch story

Article from SKY Newshttp://www.skynews.com.au/topstories/article.aspx?id=684100&vId=2841769&cId=Top%20Stories

Key Points
- James Murdoch stated that "He didn't see. He wasn't told. He didn't know." 
- Murdoch was questioned for more than two and a half hours. 

Murdoch made one important concession to their version of events - acknowledging that he'd been briefed on the incriminating email back in 2008 - but insisted that its importance was kept from him.

More than a dozen journalists at News International, News Corp.'s British newspaper subsidiary, have been arrested, and several executives, including The Wall Street Journal's publisher, Les Hinton, have resigned.

Murdoch isn't home free. A judge-led inquiry into Britain's media could call him back to the UK for more questioning. And detectives could dredge up more damaging revelations.



Key Points
- James Murdoch insisted yesterday he was not told the full scale of phone hacking at the News of the World.

The News International chairman blamed the Sunday tabloid's ex-editor Colin Myler and its legal chief Tom Crone for keeping him in the dark at a meeting in 2008.

He repeatedly told MPs he was not shown the so-called "For Neville" email, which had been marked for the paper's ex-chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck and indicated large-scale hacking.

He said: "It is not something that I would condone, it is not something I had knowledge of, and it is not something I think that has a place in the way that we operate."

Article from The Guardian- 



 

Thursday, 10 November 2011

NEWSPAPERS: The effect of online technology

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M7U_UO0dTbMwCQLKOe9D6BAseQaPjmjrAEPbCbdrqRA/edit?pli=1

Newspapers in decline.

Newspapers are in decline due to comeptition with one another. As a way of surviving this idustry they are making money from advertising. Due to E-media the print format such as newspapers are having trouble to compete as E-media is becoming increasingly better in giving news information out to it's consumers, this is because news gets distributed quicker and is easier to access. as a result of this newspapers have lost 2.25 million readers. Furthermore advertising revenue's have also decreased by 20%. As a result of this newspaper companies are making dramatic changes to their businesses such as staff cutting etc. there have been predictions made that the newspaper industry will start to decline even more and that newspaper companies will start to close down.

Why the newspaper industry is in crisis

the newspaper industry is in crisis due to the use of technology and the rise of UGC the main victim of this is the internet as it is such a broad thing in terms of websites that we can access and how user generated it is. this shows that the internet plays a more dominant role than print based information as consumers have more access to the internet than they ever have before. there are 5 reasons as to why the newspaper industry is in crisis, looking at the article that we had to read it states 5 reasons they are the following;

1. Ignoring Signs of Change.
2. Dismissing unconventional competitors.
4. Giving up on promising experiemtns too quickly.
3. Experimenting too narrowly.
5. Embarking on a 'crash course'. 



Should the news be free?

I think the news should be made free to a certain extent. My reasons for this are that we shouldn't have to pay for something that has an impact on our lives and our day to day routines. However I do think that the news shouldn't be free because this can create more damage than good because this means that many people's job's will be lost due to people becoming "citizen journalists" and because there are more ways in which the general public can get involved in producing news, for example e-media and the use of social-networking. forums and discussions on newspaper sites etc. This is an affect because it means that we are doing other peoples jobs in which they are getting paid for doing what us "citizen journalsits" are starting to do. Therefore I believe that maybe the news shouldn't be free but cheaper to access or purchase.

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

User Generated Content.

5 Example Of UGC Making The News








Gaddafi's Death- This was user generated content because the footage was first-hand and not professionally filmed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmTIUB7rKQA



9/11 sound footage- phone calls to loved one's from people of the plane: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icfkIH3j-nk



Cat Bin Lady- Filmed by CCTV footage of a house  "Surveillance Society": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXNJ3MZ-AUo

Thursday, 20 October 2011

Is reality becoming more real? The rise and rise of UGC
Sara Mills explores the rise of the citizen journalist and considers the impact of user-generated content on news stories, the news agenda, and the role of the professionals.
Once, it was all quite simple…the big institutions created the news and broadcast it to a variously passive and receptive audience. Now new technologies mean that the audience are no longer passive receivers of news. The audience have become ‘users’ and the users have become publishers. Audiences now create their own content. We are in the era of user generated content (UGC) where the old divide between institution and audience is being eroded.
Key to this change has been the development of new technologies such as video phones and the growth of the internet and user-dominated sites. Both who makes the news and what makes the news have been radically altered by this growth of media technologies and the rise of the ‘citizen journalist’.
We first felt the effects of the new technologies way back in 1991. Video cameras had become more common and more people could afford them…unfortunately for four Los Angeles police officers! Having caught Rodney King, an African-American, after a high speed chase, the officers surrounded him, tasered him and beat him with clubs. The event was filmed by an onlooker from his apartment window. The home-video footage made prime-time news and became an international media sensation, and a focus for complaints about police racism towards African-Americans. Four officers were charged with assault and use of excessive force, but in 1992 they were acquitted of the charges. This acquittal, in the face of the video footage which clearly showed the beatings, sparked huge civil unrest. There were six days of riots, 53 people died, and around 4000 people were injured. The costs of the damage, looting and clear-up came in at up to a billion dollars. If George Holliday hadn’t been looking out of his apartment window and made a grab for his video camera at the time Rodney King was apprehended, none of this would have happened. King’s beating would be just another hidden incident with no consequences. The film footage can be still be viewed. Try looking on YouTube under ‘What started the LA riots.’ But be warned – it makes for very uncomfortable viewing, and even today, it is easy to see why this minute and half of blurry, poor-quality film had such a huge impact.
This was one of the first examples of the news being generated by ‘ordinary people,’ now commonly known as ‘citizen journalists’, ‘grassroots journalists’, or even ‘accidental journalists’. As technology improved over the years, incidents of this kind have become more and more common. Millions of people have constant access to filming capability through their mobiles, and footage can be uploaded and rapidly distributed on the internet. The power to make and break news has moved beyond the traditional news institutions.
It is not only in providing footage for the news that citizen journalists have come to the forefront. UGC now plays a huge role in many aspects of the media. Most news organisations include formats for participation: message boards, chat rooms, Q&A, polls, have your says, and blogs with comments enabled. Social media sites are also built around UGC as seen in the four biggest social networking sites: Bebo, MySpace, YouTube and Facebook. People also turn to UGC sites to access news: Wikipedia news, Google news and YouTube score highly in terms of where people go to get their news.
The natural disaster of the Asian Tsunami on December 26th 2004 was another turning point for UGC. Much of the early footage of events was provided from citizen journalists, or ‘accidental journalists,’ providing on-the-spot witness accounts of events as they unfolded. Tourists who would otherwise have been happily filming holiday moments were suddenly recording one of the worst natural disasters in recent times. In addition, in the days after the disaster, social networking sites provided witness accounts for a world-wide audience, helped survivors and family members get in touch and acted as a forum all those involved to share their experiences.
A second terrible event, the London bombings on July 5th 2005, provided another opportunity for citizen journalists to influence the mainstream news agenda. No one was closer to events than those caught up in the bombings, and the footage they provided from their mobile phones was raw and uncompromising. This first-hand view, rather than professionally shot footage from behind police lines, is often more hard-hitting and emotive. An audience used to relatively unmediated reality through the prevalence of reality TV can now see similarly unmediated footage on the news.
The desire for everyone to tell their own story and have their own moment of fame may explain the huge popularity of Facebook, MySpace and other such sites. It also had a more negative outcome in the package of writings, photos and video footage that 23-year-old Seung-Hui Cho, an undergraduate at Virginia Tech, mailed into NBC News. Between his first attack, when he shot two people, he sent the package from a local post office, before going on to kill a further 30 people. In his so-called ‘manifesto’ Cho showed his paranoia and obsession, likening himself to Jesus Christ. The reporting of the terrible events at Virginia Tech that day was also affected by citizen journalism, and the footage that student Jamal Albarghouti shot on his mobile phone video camera. Rather than concentrate on saving his own life, he recorded events from his position lying on the ground near the firing. The footage, available on YouTube and CNN brought events home to a worldwide audience. We now expect passers by, witnesses, or even victims, to whip out their camera phones and record events, an instinct almost as powerful as that to save their own or others’ lives. Perhaps the news now seems old-fashioned and somehow staged if it lacks the raw, grainy low-quality footage provided by citizen journalists.
Twitter and flickr came to the forefront during the Mumbai bombings in India in late November 2008. As bombs exploded across the city, the world’s media got up-to date with events through reports on Twitter and Flickr. There were questions raised, however, that by broadcasting their tweets, people may have been putting their own and others’ lives at risk.
It was on Twitter again that the story of the Hudson River plane crash on January 15th 2009 was broken to the world. With a dramatic picture of a plane half sinking in the river, and passengers crowded on the wing awaiting rescue Janis Krun tweeted:
There’s a plane in the Hudson. I’m on the ferry going to pick up the people. Crazy.
The picture is still available on Twitpic, under ‘Janis Krun’s tweet.’ While national news organisations quickly swung into action, it was the citizen journalist, empowered by social networking sites, that first broke the story.
So who’s keeping the gate?
Are the gatekeepers still fulfilling their old function of deciding what is and isn’t news, and what will and won’t be broadcast? In some ways, yes. You can send in as much UGC to the major news organisations as you want, with no guarantee that any of it will ever be aired. In fact, last year a BBC spokesperson reported that a large proportion of photos sent in to the news unit were of kittens. While this may represent the interest of the audience, or users, it still doesn’t turn the fact that your kitten is really cute into ‘news.’
The way around the gatekeepers is with the independent media on the web. The blogosphere, for example, provides an opportunity for independent, often minority and niche views and news to reach a wide audience. In fact uniting disparate people in ‘micro-communities’ is one of the web’s greatest abilities. How else would all those ice fans communicate without the ‘Ice Chewers Bulletin Board?’ And the only place for those who like to see pictures of dogs in bee costumes is, of course, ‘Beedogs.com: the premier online repository for pictures of dogs in bee costumes.’
On a more serious note, the change in the landscape of the news means that groups who had little access to self-representation before, such as youth groups, low income groups, and various minority groups may, through citizen journalism, begin to find that they too have a voice.
What about the professionals?
Do journalists fear for their jobs now everyone is producing content? It is likely that in future there will be fewer and fewer permanent trained staff at news organisations, leaving a smaller core staff who will manage and process UGC from citizen journalists, sometimes known as ‘crowd sourcing.’ Some believe that the mediators and moderators might eventually disappear too, leaving a world where the media is, finally, unmediated. This does raise concerns however. Without moderation sites could be overrun by bigots or fools, by those who shout loudest, and those who have little else to do but make posts The risk of being dominated by defamatory or racist or other hate-fuelled content raises questions about unmoderated content: ‘free speech’ is great as long as you agree with what everybody is saying!
If there will be fewer jobs for trained journalists, will there also be less profit for the big institutions? This seems unlikely. Although how to ‘monetarise’ UGC – how to make money for both the generator and the host of the content – is still being debated, bigger institutions have been buying up social networking sites for the last few years. Rather than launch their own challenge, they simply buy the site. Flickr is now owned by Yahoo!, YouTube was bought by Google, Microsoft invested in Facebook, and News Corp., owned by Murdoch, bought MySpace.
There is a whole new world out there. With it comes new responsibility. There is enormous potential to expand our view of the world and our understanding of what is happening. Our collective knowledge, and wisdom, should grow. On the other hand, in twenty years time, the news could be overrun by pictures of people’s kittens and a few bigots shouting across message boards at each other.
Sara Mills teaches Media Studies at Helston Community College, Cornwall, and is an AQA examiner.
This article first appeared in MediaMagazine 30, December 2009.

What is meant by the term ‘citizen journalist’?
The term 'citizen journalist' means that the public have become the main speakers for giving the news and writing about it through the use of UGC such as news websites by giving their own thoughts and opinions, social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter etc. 

What was one of the first examples of news being generated by ‘ordinary people’?
The first examples of news being generated by 'ordinary people' was footage of the LA riots found on YouTube. These were also known as 'citizen journalists', 'grasshopper journalists' and 'accidental journalists'. 

List some of the formats for participation that are now offered by news organisations.
The formats that are offered by news organisations are the following; message boards, chat rooms, Q and A, polls, have your says and blogs with comments enabled. 

What is one of the main differences between professionally shot footage and that taken first-hand (UGC)?
The difference between professionally shot footage and footage taken first-hand is that first-hand footage is taken there and then and is immediate, professionally shot footage is organised beforehand in order to capture a moment at a specific time to create a news story.

What is a gatekeeper?
A gatekeeper is a person that controls what is and isn't in the news. They also control what gets broadcasted and what doesn't. Audiences can send in as much UGC as they want but there isn't any guarantee that it will get shown because a 'gatekeeper' has control over what gets shown to audiences. 

How has the role of a gatekeeper changed?
The role of a gatekeeper has changed because its the fact that news can be shared anywhere by anyone, also it has changed because it's not one person that controls who see's it and what the audiences get shown. 


What is one of the primary concerns held by journalists over the rise of UGC?
The primary concerns held by journalists over the rise of UGC is that they are losing control over what is being reported and shown. As a result of this audiences are controlling what gets shown through the use of UGC taking this control and regulation from journalists by creating more unbiased opinions within what gets shown, as we are seeing more from others own opinions by the use of first-hand footage taken at the time of something happening. 

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

corrections for essay on the 'Arab Spring'

Is the internet now controleld by big media institutions? Does this current situation threaten to underline the 'Internet Revolution' for its users?

An example of the internet being controlled by the media is what is known as an 'Arab Spring' this means that countries that are uprising and aren't listening to their leader are finding ways to make a stand. This suggests freedom from big media institutions because they are voicing their own opinions. The way in which they did this was through Facebook. They used Facebook to break free from this feeling of being trapped by their government. however this article suggests that the government wanted to ban these social networking sites, in attempt to do so they failed. This suggests that big media institutions didn't have control over this.
http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-news/facebook-and-twitter-key-to-arab-spring-uprisings-report
This was because too many people would be involved and only a minority of people were involved in this so call 'Arab Spring' and they were identified in the Middle East and North Africa, whereas people who have joined Facebook are a majority, not only would banning Facebook affect the people involved in the 'Arab Spring' but it would affect people world wide. 

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

Case Study On CNN- Mr Bush

Media Case Study 

Who owns CNN? Ted Turner

Do they also own any traditional media businesses? No they don’t own any traditional media but they own Time Warner, Ted Turner joined together with Time Warner and CNN in a merger.

What other internet sites do they own? They also own Cartoon Network, Warner Brothers, HBO and Castle Rock Entertainment.

What is its revenue/market value, What is its overall worth? CNN’s over market value and overall worth is $878.2 million annually.

Four key facts about the institutions:

- They make more than Fox news

- The CNN have covered many world events since 1980, an example is the explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1986. They also have coverage of the golf war

- They were the first channel to break the news about the 9/11and was on air to deliver the first report of the event.

- All cable news channels see that there had been a drop in viewers for the first time in 12 years, their impact was 37% during March.

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

The Impact Of Social Media On The London Riots__ Mr Bush




http://www.businessweek.com/technology/network-effects-social-medias-role-in-the-london-riots-08082011.html
"In some cases, this is because mobile and social tools like Twitter and Facebook and SMS messaging can be used to coordinate specific acts or gatherings"


http://blog.optimum7.com/safon/social-media/social-media-effects-riots-in-uk.html
"One of the primary forms of communication was Blackberry Messages (BBM). Huge amounts of information, both true and false, was sent out to millions of residents. Not only were professional news companies attempting to keep up with the situation, the authorities were straggling behind as well."


"After all is said and done, these same social media platforms were used to quell the majority of the violence, and eventually clean up the city. As quickly as social media was blamed for the riots, it helped to pick up the pieces. Thousands of locals organized on Facebook, Twitter, and over BBM to perform massive clean ups around the city."